Hi there, On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 09:36:34AM +0100, O.Felka wrote: > >>I'm using this Office > >>http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_de.exe > >>on WinXP - SP3. > >> > >>Regards,Ok, without an official AOO build QA work is nonsense. It makes no > >>sense to jumpp from developer playground A to developer build b to c to see > >>if something is fixed. > >>Olaf > >> > >I'm using > >http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe > > > > > >Regards, > >Zoltan > > > > Ok, I see. > Without an official AOO build QA work is nonsense.
I tend to disagree here. It seems you're not subscribed to the issues mailing list (ooo-issues-subscr...@incubator.apache.org). Many issues have been discovered (and even solved) since we started providing builds for testing purposes. Calling this a nonsense is underestimating the efforts of people doing the build, people doing the QA (Regina, Reizinger, Oliver, et. al.), and people solving the issues. Just to quote an example, Regina's work testing the new SVG implementation is remarkable, and I'm sure Armin appreciates it. Facts have shown that builds are useful, we have volunteers willing to help QAing, so we should keep providing them until we have official weekly Developer Snapshots. That said, I agree that the situation is suboptimal, but we do not have buildboots for all platforms yet. > It makes no sense > to jump from developer playground A to developer build b to c to see > if something is fixed or not. Back to the present issue, as I wrote in the bug, we have to split: a) this issue, detect JRE 7.0 version b) issues with things that don't work with JRE 7 For (b), please open new bug reports of the kind "[java 7] XXX does not work" or the like. And set them as blockers for i118352 when/if they are confirmed. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina
pgpRHGTJXFw3m.pgp
Description: PGP signature
