Steven,

I'm trying to clarify the scenario...

Do you mean that, you need a (Blanks)/(Non-Blanks) condition in the
autofilter? Why is it related with top 50/100?

I just had a quick look. One alternative to do that, is to use Standard
Filter...and then set empty/not empty" in the filter...not one step
solution...does it help?

Helen

2012/3/16 Steven Asselman <steven.assel...@gmail.com>

> oh, also I could make a row for each top 50 and 100 next to it with a check
> If(blank)... in it and use that in the autofilter... But that's well,
> ugly...
>
> Op 15 maart 2012 23:04 schreef Steven Asselman
> <steven.assel...@gmail.com>het volgende:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been trying out OpenOffice today and while I'm very thankful for
> this
> > good Office, there's a thing that bugs me...
> >
> > The one feature that I find very useful about Excel is the "(blanks)" and
> > "(nonblanks)" in the autofilter on a row.
> >
> > Where does this come in use? Well, I have an Excel where I aggregate
> > scores AND ranks in tops for TV-series. From these I calcutate an average
> > of some sorts. The nonblanks come in use when I want to see every
> tv-serie
> > in a certain top 50. As you can see, this spreadsheet is a mix between a
> > database and a spreadsheet, but... Well, I could write a webapp in C# and
> > access the data from a database... But that's a *huge*  workaround.
> >
> > I'm sure I'm not the only one who used Excel like this and it seems to me
> > (blanks)/(nonblanks) seems not to mucht effort to include in an update.
> > Actually, as I'm a software develor myself, I would find this a nice
> > challenge.
> >
> >
> > I hope you can now see why this feature in Excel is helpful. I'm
> > disappointed that this means I still have to use Excel for this sheet, I
> > guess I'm not the only one in the world, so hopefully you know have
> enough
> > reasons to include this feature-request.  Thanks in advance.
> >
> > --
> > Kind Regards,
> > - Steven Asselman
> > (The Netherlands)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Met vriendelijke groet,
> - Steven Asselman
>

Reply via email to