On 10.04.2012 07:12, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:16:38PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Does anybody have tested an upgrade installation with these new
Linux packages and can verify the reported problem, see
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119162
I think we haven't noticed this problem before and I would be
interested if others can confirm this problem.
I will be offline for ~1 day because of traveling and I will make
the call for VOTE depending on the feedback from you.
Old basis package set remaining is the default behaviour, at least
tested with OOo 3.0.0. On Fedora 16:
- install OOo 3.0.0 (OOO300_m9 9358)
- install OOo 3.1.1 (OOO310_m19 9420)
1) there is an issue with the desktop integration, same for AOO
2) the old basis3.0 remains:
/opt/openoffice.org/basis3.0
/opt/openoffice.org/basis3.1
All ooobasis3.0 packages are kept.
Strange.
Here is what I would expect would happen on an update:
- There is one top-level or meta package that has dependencies on all
the other packages (directly or indirectly)
- This meta package of OOo3.? is replaced by AOO3.4
- The packages of OOo3.? are not referenced anymore and get removed
automatically. The new packages are installed. Everything is find.
So one of the following things goes wrong:
- The old meta package is not removed because the new one has no
relationship to it (maybe because of a different application name)
- The old meta package is removed but some other package keeps a
reference to one of OOo3.? base packages.
- Something else that I did not think of yet (I am currently on a
business trip and am still adapting to the new time zone)
Regards,
Andre
>[...]
