On Apr 20, 2012, at 11:25 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hi Dave; > > --- Ven 20/4/12, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > ... >> >> On Apr 20, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> >>> Pedro Giffuni wrote on Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 07:41:19 >> -0700: > ... >>>> >>>> We are specifically warning people that the older >>>> OOo releases contain security and IP risks so it >>>> would be inconsistent to carry those in Apache >>>> mirrors. >>>> >>>> So, yes, those can be dropped. >>>> >>> >>> Thanks, I'll take that answer back to the mirror >>> operators if no one disagrees in the next few days. >> >> I think that Kay just disagreed, but only on the ooo-dev >> part of the thread. >> > > I don't think he suggested we force mirrors to carry > old versions. > > I think Kay's (and Regina's) concern will be solved once > 3.3.0 finds it's way into > http://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/ooo/
These can be pulled in from download.services.openoffice.org and MirrorBrain. Then MirrorBrain will need to change to use archive.apache.org as a source. > > And of course people can always choose to carry those > older versions on their own if they want to. Sure. Regards, Dave > > Pedro. > >
