On Apr 20, 2012, at 2:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > [email protected] wrote on Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 14:38:34 -0700: >> I'm assuming by Pedro's remark that if 3.3.0 is ported to Apache >> archives, security patches will have been applied -- i.e. THAT version >> rebuilt with security, right? > > "Rebuilt" kind of defeats the purpose of archives..
I'd expect it to just be the current archive as well. Adding the need to have every 3.3 patched is an unnecessary prerequisite to mirroring 3.3 in the archives. Instead writing scripts and instructions enabling users to apply the current security patch on Linux is a separate task for another thread. Regards, Dave > > (the same version number shouldn't correspond to more than one set of > source code)
