2012/5/21 Juergen Schmidt <jogischm...@googlemail.com>:
> Am Sonntag, 20. Mai 2012 um 18:21 schrieb Nelson Marques:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823217
>>
>> Guys, like I said previously, there's only 2 ways to get out of this
>> with RPM and YUM/Zypp (Red Hat/Clones and *SUSE):
>>
>> 1) Insert an Epoch on the rpm spec template:
>>
>> (...)
>> Name: ....
>> Epoch: 2000
>> Version:
>> Release: ....
>> (...)
>>
>> 2) Rename the packages, ex:
>> - aao-base
>> - aao-ure
>> - aao-writer
>>
>> I suggest aao, because that's the same name used on the source,
>> so it would get somehow uniform around.
>>
>>
>
> no, I assume you mean aoo. But again please be careful with such changes, I 
> don't see demand for it now. I would prefer to seek the dialog with the 
> distros that they change the package names or any other names, registry 
> entries that relies to OpenOffice but are currently used by LibreOffice. I 
> won't accept that LibreOffice replace OpenOffice without making clear that 
> there is a newer version for OOo ad well or better to replace it in general.
>

Sorry, you are right, I meant aoo. Please consider that I only
repackaged for my own usage, now I can have both Libre Office and
Apache OpenOffice on the same system without conflicts. I'm not
sharing anything with the public.

While I can offer myself to help improving your packaging, there's not
really anything else I can do ;)

> Juergen
>>
>>
>> Either way this isn't an issue anymore for me, as from this point on I
>> am forced to rebuild AAO; since there are no real problems with this
>> option, thats my path, since it allows me not to depend on upstream
>> neither on vendor tyranical approach.
>>
>> NM
>>
>>
>>
>> 2012/5/20 Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com>:
>> > On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Pedro Giffuni <p...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Dennis;
>> > >
>> > > --- Sab 19/5/12, Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamil...@acm.org> ha scritto:
>> > > ...
>> > > > One enduring solution would be to
>> > > > break with the past and not use the same file names for the
>> > > > binary bits, the same registry keys, etc., any longer.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > A better solution is to move to FreeBSD or PC-BSD :).
>> >
>> > I had a feeling this was coming! :)
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Pedro.
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > MzK
>> >
>> > "The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated."
>> >                                 -- Mark Twain
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Nelson Marques
>> // I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece of
>> bread in the middle...
>>
>>
>
>



-- 
Nelson Marques
// I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece of
bread in the middle...

Reply via email to