Thanks to Ji..And I have attached 8 samples with brief description to verify this problem in this issue 120016<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120016> ..
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Yan Ji <yanji...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jian Hong, > > I create defect Bug 120016[1] to record the issue > > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120016 > > Thanks & Best Regards, Yan Ji > > On Jun 15, 2012, at 8:24 PM, chengjh wrote: > > > Oliver,thanks a lot for your effort to look at this issue.Currently,there > > isn't any issue about it in AOO Bugzilla.Our qe will help to open one for > > it.And I will attach my samples for your reference.Good Weekend! > > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann < > > orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >> On 15.06.2012 10:26, chengjh wrote: > >> > >>> There is an enhancement in OO 2.0.3, delivered with the name > >>> "Compatibility > >>> option: Keep-with-next attribute for table rows". > >>> The details of the feature can be gotten from > >>> http://www.openoffice.org/**development/releases/2.0.3.**html< > http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/2.0.3.html>. > >>> A new (non-UI) > >>> compatibility option "TableRowKeep" has been added to Writer > documents. If > >>> this option is enabled, a table row can be forced to keep together with > >>> the > >>> next row by setting the keep-with-next attribute to the first paragraph > >>> within the first cell of this row. If this row is the last row of a > table, > >>> the last row tries to keep together with the next content behind the > >>> table. > >>> This compatibility option is disabled per default and enabled during > >>> ww8/rtf import. > >>> > >>> This enhancement try to provide the behavior and layout compatibility > of > >>> MS > >>> Word's table,within which the first para of the cell has the "Keep with > >>> next(Paragraph Dialog->Line and Page Breaks in MS Word)".. > >>> > >>> This enhancement still has something to do in order to provide > completed > >>> compatibility.The known cases provided by "TableRowKeep" Feature as > >>> followed: > >>> *a)*If the table is the first lower content of a page, the "keep with > >>> next" > >>> > >>> attribute of the first para of the first row&column will works as > normal, > >>> The first row will not be moved to new page..*But if the contents > within > >>> > >>> the first row is enough to be beyond the height of the page,the row > will > >>> not split, the part beyond page will be truncated in AOO..* > >>> *b)*If the table is the first lower content of a page, the "keep with > >>> next" > >>> > >>> attribute of the first para of the 1 column/ 2 row will make table > from > >>> the second row, moved to new page..*But if the contents within the > second > >>> > >>> row is enough to be beyond the height of the page,the row will not > >>> split, the part beyond page will be truncated **in AOO**..* > >>> *c)*If the table is the first lower content of a page, the "keep with > >>> next" > >>> > >>> attribute of the first para of the first row&column and the 1 column/ > 2 > >>> row will works as normal, not moved to new page in MS Word..In AOO,the > >>> table from the second row will be moved to new page..That's the > >>> difference..Moreover,* if the contents within the First or second row > is > >>> > >>> enough to be beyond the height of the page,the row will not split, the > >>> part > >>> beyond page will be truncated** in AOO**..* > >>> > >>> > >>> This problem is related to the formatting of table and impact the table > >>> formatting procedure deeply.Anyone is interesting in it?Thanks. > >>> > >> > >> I am remembering the implemenation of this feature - a former colleague > >> had implemented it. > >> I will have a look at the corresponding code. > >> > >> Jianhong Cheng: Do you have a sample document already? Does there > already > >> exist a corresponding issue in AOO Bugzilla? > >> > >> Best regards, Oliver. > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best Regards,Jianhong Cheng > > -- Best Regards,Jianhong Cheng
