On Jul 27, 2012, at 2:49 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Marcus (OOo) <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote: >> Am 07/27/2012 02:25 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: >> >>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Jürgen Schmidt >>> <jogischm...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> do we need special preparation for the upcoming release of aOO 3.4.1? >>>> >>> >>> I think we should start preparations for: >>> >>> 1) Updating the /download site to point to 3.4.1 release files >> >> >> Of course you mean *prepare* the update, aren't you? ;-) >> >> I'll takeover this part and try to deliver first things on Sunday.
We should avoid even modifying ooo-site staging as people may very well inadvertently push to production. > Ok, let us know when you want to light it up, since we do need to > prime the mirrors before. Whoa, slow down. There is no way that we are releasing on Sunday. ASFAIK. No one has cut, proposed, reviewed or VOTED on any AOO 3.4.1 RC of any kind. It's good to be ready, but let's not jump the gun. Regards, Dave > > Thanks, > > Roberto > >> >> I don't know if I can bring in some more automatism for the releade (DL >> links in the table, with checksums, etc.) but maybe then short after. >> >> >>> 2) Keep the legacy download page as it is now, pointing to the >>> previous major release, which is still OOo 3.3.0 >> >> >> Yes. IMHO we should change this earliest with 3.5 when we can offer some new >> features. But latestly 4.0 is the time to delete the legacy website stuff >> and point the users to the archive when there is still need for the last OOo >> release. >> >> Marcus >> >> >> >> >>> 3) Copy the AOO 3.4.0 files into archives.apache.org >>> >>> 4) Draft the announcement blog post >>> >>> 5) Submit SHA256 hashes to Symantec for whitelisting. (Any other AV >>> vendors have a similar process?) >>> >>> 6) Update the podling website to point to the new source distribution >>> >>> Of course, these are preparations only at this point. We'll need to >>> wait for an approved ballot to actually complete 3 and 5, and will >>> need to wait for the mirrors and SourceForge to update with the >>> released files before we pull the trigger on the other items. >>> >>> I'm already working on #4. I did #5 before and can do it again, >>> unless anyone else wants to see how this is done. >>> >>> -Rob >>> >>> >>> >>>> I assume that we don't have the time to rework the directory structure >>>> for this release. I would keep it for now in the same structure as for >>>> 3.4 but would like to work a simply structure for 3.5 in time. >>>> >>>> Juergen > > -- > ==== > This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It > may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the > intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly > prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately > notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any > attachment(s) from your system. Thank you. >
