On 8/23/12 3:03 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 8/23/12 2:28 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 02:18:22PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> I was too fast and should have read the thread completely. >>> >>> I can't remember the reason why I left out the en-US lang packs, we >>> should check if they are necessary at all or if en-US is always there. >> >> If you install a localized install set, you get only that localized >> language. IIRC OOo never released en-US language packs, that's why many >> people working in translation, needing to check some UI string in >> English, ended up installing the en-GB language pack. Although for this >> use case, it would be better to provide archived versions. >> >> It would be interesting to know the statistics, from which countries >> where those en-US language packs downloaded. > > seems to be room for improvements, maybe we should think about > multi-lang office with 2 langs -> en-US + 1 lang or move forward with > the en-US language pack
the easier part is to provide the en-US language packs that we have voted on and that were part of the snapshot builds. I still don't know why I have left them out... Maybe I simply have overseen them because of our stupid directory structure I have to copy en-US separately. But that should be no excuse ;-) By the way I have copied them already on dist. I will also work on some SDK release notes but I am not sure if I will finish this before I go on vacation on Saturday. I have some other things on my to-do list first. Juergen
