On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Greg Madden <gomadtr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Wolf Halton <wolf.hal...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Sounds like it might not take too much effort to get it to work in Ubuntu. >> >> Wolf Halton >> http://sourcefreedom.com >> Apache developer: >> wolfhal...@apache.org >> On Aug 24, 2012 4:37 PM, "Marcelo Santana" <msant...@cnen.gov.br> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 03:45:38 +0800, imacat <ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw> >>> wrote: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>> Hi there, >>> >>> > Hmm... in that case, shouldn't these package files work on >>> > Squeeze, too? Why is Wheezy? Wheezy is not released yet. >>> >>> I'm not sure, but probably yes because there is no package dependency >>> which prevent it to be installed on the squeeze. But I've not tested >>> yet. > > I am a Debian user. I switched to AOO a while back because of a > regression in LO that affects my work. I have been using the dev > builds, works great....thanks. > > I am testing Wheezy in a VM , tried the sourceforge Debian repo's. The > issue I am seeing is Debian still uses 'openoffice' in their package > management systems. Trying to find/install openoffice results in > links to libreoffice.
My mistake, wrong sources.list entry. > > While this is probable an issue to discuss with Debian, I am wondering > how this repo is working for others. What is the package name to > install AOO ? I now see it is openoffice.org3. Debian, Wheezy , does use 'openoffice.org though. -- Peace Greg Madden
