On 9/6/12 11:52 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 09/06/2012 01:33 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: >> >> >> On 09/02/2012 03:18 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 09/02/2012 08:02 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I was busy at the weekend to clean-up the DL scripting. >>>> >>>> The new webpages are accessible here (as long as they are not >>>> published): >>>> >>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/index.html >>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/other.html >>>> >>>> Some notes before you start with checking out: >>>> >>>> 1. >>>> The current focus is on reducing complexity, better simplification and >>>> more automatism. Not the design and layout. This is nearly the same. >>>> >>>> 2. >>>> It's normal that not all links will work as it's only a part of the >>>> download area. It depends on the link itself if it's not yet working or >>>> really broken. ;-) >>>> >>>> 3. >>>> When you find errors and want to report them please make sure to browse >>>> to the following webpage to help me with some debug data: >>>> >>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/analyze.html >>>> >>>> Next big step is to implement the new directory structure on the >>>> mirrors. >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance for your comments. >>>> >>>> Marcus >>> >>> VERY good! I am looking at changes in svn and I can see MUCH >>> improvement. I will try to help with suggestions in the coming week. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> ...more >> >> You are making very good progress and I hesitate to just make changes >> without discussion. >> >> What do you suggest for this?? Additional sections on the wiki page?? >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Improvements+for+the+download+webpages >> > > Hm, I've already created a new table in the Wiki to document the > separating the general improvements from the one towards the new mirror > structure. > > But I think this is now enough. Otherwise the overview is really gone. > >> attachment of pertinent files to the wiki page with comments? > > When the things are discussed and done then these data normally remains > - at least this is my impression from other Wiki pages. Then the is also > gone. Besides this I think it becomes very fast a real clutch. > > Let's see if we can make some progress here on the ML. When there is > something valuable, then we can take it over to the Wiki page. So, I > would suggest to create new threads with appropriate tags like "[DL > scripting][SCHEMA] ..." > > What do you think? > > Marcus >
I think we can finalize the future directory structure #part 2 on the wiki page. Current proposal: .../ooo/<VERSION>/source/ .../ooo/<VERSION>/bin/<LANG>/ .../ooo/<VERSION>/bin/SDK/ When I remember there were some concerns regarding "bin". And I would keep the project name open or flexible assuming a change in favor of "aoo". .../<PROJECT_NAME>/<VERSION>/source/ .../<PROJECT_NAME>/<VERSION>/binaries/<LANG>/ .../<PROJECT_NAME>/<VERSION>/binaries/SDK/ Where PROJECT_NAME is something like "ooo" or "aoo" or "openoffice". I would say we need no voting for this and need further discussion only if somebody see some problems with the new proposed structure. Juergen
