I think the geometry difference between AOO and MS can be taken as a feature gap. And the fill difference is the result of the feature gap when import/export.
2012/9/11 Regina Henschel <rb.hensc...@t-online.de> > Hi Jianyuan, > > Jianyuan Li schrieb: > > Hi, Regina, >> Thanks for the good catch. I agree with you. See my comments in bugzilla. >> >> Regards, >> Jianyuan >> > > It remains the problem, that the corresponding shape in PowerPoint has > different kind of filling than the shape in AOO. > > Perhaps it is possible to generate a new shape during import without > adding it to any toolbox? In that way the shape would look the same as in > MS Office documents. And such generic import would give other still missing > shapes too. > > AOO can handle arbitrary custom shapes in ODF format. They do not need to > be in the predefined collection. But I don't know, whether MS Office has > this ability too. Therefore a round trip might be problematic. > > Kind regards > Regina > > > >> 2012/9/10 Regina Henschel <rb.hensc...@t-online.de> >> >> Jianyuan Li schrieb: >>> >>> Hi, all, >>> >>>> >>>> I have fixes for 2 shape geometry bugs. Can anyone help review? More >>>> details can be found in bugzilla comments. Thanks. >>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/****show_bug.cgi?id=120848<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=120848> >>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_**bug.cgi?id=120848<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120848> >>>> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/****show_bug.cgi?id=120870<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=120870> >>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_**bug.cgi?id=120870<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120870> >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm not sure about issue 120870. The current definition leads to three >>> separate fillings and to breaking up into three polygons. Is that >>> behavior >>> preserved? >>> >>> Kind regards >>> Regina >>> >>> >>> >> >
