A new custom cube shape(just like my patch) can be defined in AOO for MS cube shape. But the focus is whether it is valued or not.
2012/9/11 Jianyuan Li <lijianyuan1...@gmail.com> > I think the geometry difference between AOO and MS can be taken as a > feature gap. And the fill difference is the result of the feature gap when > import/export. > > > 2012/9/11 Regina Henschel <rb.hensc...@t-online.de> > >> Hi Jianyuan, >> >> Jianyuan Li schrieb: >> >> Hi, Regina, >>> Thanks for the good catch. I agree with you. See my comments in bugzilla. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jianyuan >>> >> >> It remains the problem, that the corresponding shape in PowerPoint has >> different kind of filling than the shape in AOO. >> >> Perhaps it is possible to generate a new shape during import without >> adding it to any toolbox? In that way the shape would look the same as in >> MS Office documents. And such generic import would give other still missing >> shapes too. >> >> AOO can handle arbitrary custom shapes in ODF format. They do not need to >> be in the predefined collection. But I don't know, whether MS Office has >> this ability too. Therefore a round trip might be problematic. >> >> Kind regards >> Regina >> >> >> >>> 2012/9/10 Regina Henschel <rb.hensc...@t-online.de> >>> >>> Jianyuan Li schrieb: >>>> >>>> Hi, all, >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I have fixes for 2 shape geometry bugs. Can anyone help review? More >>>>> details can be found in bugzilla comments. Thanks. >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/****show_bug.cgi?id=120848<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=120848> >>>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_**bug.cgi?id=120848<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120848> >>>>> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/****show_bug.cgi?id=120870<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=120870> >>>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_**bug.cgi?id=120870<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120870> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm not sure about issue 120870. The current definition leads to three >>>> separate fillings and to breaking up into three polygons. Is that >>>> behavior >>>> preserved? >>>> >>>> Kind regards >>>> Regina >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
