FWIW, Reverting r1394707 on main/set_soenv.in (only) fixes the issue so one of the 5 changesets involved in that commit is the culprit.
While here, main/solenv/gbuild/platform/linux.mk has repeated terms between line 140-150. cheers, Pedro. >________________________________ > From: Pedro Giffuni <p...@apache.org> >To: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org" <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org> >Sent: Friday, October 5, 2012 3:01 PM >Subject: Re: [CODE] gmake and AOO build system > >The buildsys branch looks broken here: > >... >Configure completed > >Run ./bootstrap in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main to >provide build tools and get third-party packages >===> Building for apache-openoffice-3.4.1391327,1 >chmod: /solenv/bin/build.pl: No such file or directory >chmod: /solenv/bin/build_client.pl: No such file or directory >chmod: /solenv/bin/zipdep.pl: No such file or directory >chmod: /solenv/bin/gccinstlib.pl: No such file or directory >./bootstrap: download_missing_extensions.pl: not found >*** Error code 127 > >Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel. >*** Error code 1 >___ > >Looks like a path issue. > >cheers, > >Pedro. > > > >>________________________________ >> From: Andrew Rist <andrew.r...@oracle.com> >>To: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org" <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org> >>Cc: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org" <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org> >>Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2012 11:16 PM >>Subject: Re: [CODE] gmake and AOO build system >> >>I'll checkin the code this week - was trying to get a working env with he >>branch, and was having the usual issues. >>Don't know how far we're taking this , but would be nice to leave the build >>cleaner and more stable... >> >>A >> >>Sent from my iThingie >> >>On Sep 30, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Pedro Giffuni <p...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ariel; >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: Ariel Constenla-Haile <arie...@apache.org> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Hi Pedro, >>>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 09:07:03AM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >>>>> There is currently nothing here, in fact trunk is more up to date. >>>>> Can I start committing stuff or should Andrew do it? >>>> >>>> IMHO only Andrew, as Oracle representative, can commit the patches. The >>>> idea is to ensure that patches are granted by Oracle without the need to >>>> ask for another software grant for this particular cws. I guess this >>>> should be the procedure people should follow if interested in getting >>>> cws code granted by Oracle; the other way is to ask for a software grant >>>> on every file in the cws, but I guess that this won't scale (Oracle will >>>> have to redo the same amount of work they did for the original software >>>> grant). >>> >>> OK, I can wait. >>> >>>> Concerning this particular case, once Andrew commits the patches, there >>>> should be some agreement on what to do: IMHO, the first thing should be >>>> to ensure that the code builds in Windows, Linux and MacOSX (that cws >>>> didn't originally take into account OS2 nor FreeBSD), otherwise there is >>>> the chance that changes made for OS2/FreeBSD/Solaris/etc end up breaking >>>> something that was actually working in the cws; and it may be then hard >>>> to guess where and why it got broken (just like the boost/stlport case). >>> >>> I expect the only files that I have to touch are FreeBSD specific so that >>> probably won't be the case here. In any case I would expect the branch >>> won't be merged into trunk until any issue with the FreeBSD and/or >>> Linux/Mac Windows ports are fixed. >>> >>> cheers, >>> >>> Pedro. >> >> >> > >
