On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Marcus (OOo) <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote: > Am 10/10/2012 09:08 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > >> On 09/10/2012 Kay Schenk wrote: >>> >>> http://www.openoffice.org/test/ ... >>> I am invoking *lazy consensus* on these changes and put this in place >>> sometime on Sat, PDT -- say 15:30, unless there are objections. >> >> >> It's nice indeed. I only see the "Valid XHTML" icon positioned a bit too >> high maybe... Is it wanted? >> http://people.apache.org/~pescetti/tmp/ooo-www-test.png >> >> And, by the way, clicking on it reveals that there are a couple of >> markup fixes to apply, but I don't know if those are due to the CMS or >> to specific markup of the page. > > > Currenty it's 1 warning and 1 error. The warning comes because the validator > uses a new HTML 5 checker which is still in Beta status. IMHO it's > irrelevant. > > The error is due to the "PUBLISHER" tag in the link reference (line 8). > > Due to the following webpage "PUBLISHER" is no valid HTML style. However I > wouldn't change it as it seems to be used for Google index referencing: >
If you make it lower case "publisher" it should be OK. -Rob > http://www.thoughtsfromgeeks.com/resources/2793-Rel-publisher-standard-HTML-markup-or.aspx > > Marcus
