On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 10:49 AM, RGB ES <rgb.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2012/10/20 jan iversen <jancasacon...@gmail.com> > >> I really like the logo on the openOffice.org site, it is (at least to me) >> more modern and eye-catching. >> > > +1 > > >> >> We should only use 1 logo, that is simpler and for the end-user more >> understandable. >> > > +1 too. >
OK. I changed the openoffice.apache.org website to use the same logo as www.openoffice.org. But I am sympathetic to Alexandro's view that we need across-the-board greater consistency on branding. We'll get there, I think, but it will take time. -Rob > Regards > Ricardo > > >> >> Jan. >> >> On 20 October 2012 16:28, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > See upper left here: http://openoffice.apache.org >> > >> > The "Incubating" is integrated into the graphic. >> > >> > The underlying file is here: a PNG with transparent background. >> > >> > http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/images/300x100_dj_trans.png >> > >> > What do we want to do here? >> > >> > 1) Edit that graphic to remove "Incubating"? >> > >> > 2) Use a different graphic? >> > >> > Note that the http://www.openoffice.org/ site uses a different form of >> > the branding. Are we intentionally using two different logos here? >> > Do we want to continue this? >> > >> > -Rob >> > >>
