On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 10:49 AM, RGB ES <rgb.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2012/10/20 jan iversen <jancasacon...@gmail.com> > > > >> I really like the logo on the openOffice.org site, it is (at least to > me) > >> more modern and eye-catching. > >> > > > > +1 > > > > > >> > >> We should only use 1 logo, that is simpler and for the end-user more > >> understandable. > >> > > > > +1 too. > > > > OK. I changed the openoffice.apache.org website to use the same logo > as www.openoffice.org. > > But I am sympathetic to Alexandro's view that we need across-the-board > greater consistency on branding. We'll get there, I think, but it > will take time. > > -Rob > > > Regards > > Ricardo > > > > > >> > >> Jan. > >> > >> On 20 October 2012 16:28, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> > See upper left here: http://openoffice.apache.org > >> > > >> > The "Incubating" is integrated into the graphic. > >> > > >> > The underlying file is here: a PNG with transparent background. > >> > > >> > http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/images/300x100_dj_trans.png > >> > > >> > What do we want to do here? > >> > > >> > 1) Edit that graphic to remove "Incubating"? > >> > > >> > 2) Use a different graphic? > >> > > >> > Note that the http://www.openoffice.org/ site uses a different form > of > >> > the branding. Are we intentionally using two different logos here? > >> > Do we want to continue this? > Well most of the artwork is done, is just a matter of doing the commit to the right branch. Linux has png files so they are taken from the site, which also has the .ico and icm for windows and mac. Besides that, I wonder what else would be needed. Example Writer: Linux: http://www.openoffice.org/ui/VisualDesign/gifs/Icons/refresh_icons/pngs/OOo_Writer_48x48.png Windows: http://www.openoffice.org/ui/VisualDesign/gifs/Icons/refresh_icons/icos/OOo_Writer.ico OSX: Not required Mime-type: http://www.openoffice.org/ui/VisualDesign/gifs/Icons/ODF_icons/ODF_textdocument_256x256.png The original discussion on the lack of color of OO3 generated different options which were ignored, should we adopt them now? https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 There was some icons donated on issuezzilla: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118820 (not impressed) > >> > > >> > -Rob > >> > > >> > -- Alexandro Colorado PPMC Apache OpenOffice http://es.openoffice.org
