+1 for me it had ended. On 1 November 2012 18:56, Andrea Pescetti <[email protected]> wrote:
> jan iversen wrote: > >> hmmm...sorry to say this, but is that really something that have to be >> discussed in private !!!! >> > > Indeed, it isn't. ooo-private is not used for decisions, but just for > discussions about individuals and about trademark violations, which would > be inappropriate on public lists. > > Apache OpenOffice uses public lists for everything, including all decision > making (except when we are discussing/voting on an individual), fund > allocation, project strategy... > > (To be picky, this is something that shouldn't belong to ooo-l10n > either... but actually it is something that should not have happened in > first place, and I hope we can conclude that the "head-hunting" was just an > episode) > > Regards, > Andrea. >
