On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:47 PM, jan iversen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Alexandro. > > when you write "not unit testing persay", you think of the UNO API testing > ? > > So there are/was basically no direct test of the C++ code, like for e.g. > transex3 testing it handles the files correctly. > > I would have think it would be needed, not only for tools (like l10n), but > also for some of the deep internal functions, like e.g. the actual UNO > implemtation ? > > jan. > > On 5 November 2012 21:33, Alexandro Colorado <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:22 AM, jan iversen <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > I like the page(s), it really getting to be a round introduction for > new > > > volunteers. > > > > > > I have one question, I thought QA was the right place to find > information > > > about AOO requirements for unit testing of C++ code, but I cannot find > it > > > in wiki nor in the QA mail list. Am searching for the wrong words, or > do > > we > > > in general not have unit testing ? > > > > > > > there is/was automation testing but is not unit testing persay. Wiki > > information: > > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/test_automation_guide > > > > > > > > > > My question for asking, it that I want to make that the new l10n > programs > > > (which are tools with no gui, and not part of the installation package) > > is > > > automatically tested. > > > > > > By the way, I am new on this list but have been on dev/l10n for a > little > > > while (you find me on the volunteers page). Long time ago I took an > > > education as ISO 9000 auditor, and used it on a couple of projects, > from > > my > > > work for big companies, I have been heavily involved in testing > > > requirements, but only seen from the developer side! > > > > > > If I can be of assistance, I would be glad to help. > > > > > > Have a nice day. > > > Jan I. > > > > > > On 5 November 2012 16:14, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Zhe Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Nice! > > > > > It's better to merge your page and the following page into one. > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/qa.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > I took a look. I think it is still a good idea to have a "Quality > > > > Assurance" page and a link to it on the navigator. But we can link > to > > > > the orientation page for the "getting started" info. > > > > > > > > I'll make some changes. > > > > > > > > -Rob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2012/11/3 Rob Weir <[email protected]>: > > > > >> I took the draft that Yan Ji started and added some additional > > > material: > > > > >> > > > > >> > http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/orientation/intro-qa.html > > > > >> > > > > >> Please take a look. > > > > >> > > > > >> Are there any other changes needed? Or is it ready? > > > > >> > > > > >> -Rob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Best Regards > > > > > From [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Alexandro Colorado > > PPMC Apache OpenOffice > > http://es.openoffice.org > > > -- Alexandro Colorado PPMC Apache OpenOffice http://es.openoffice.org
