Thanks I will do that, there is even a name I know from the old linux days.
have a nice day Jan I. On 5 November 2012 22:07, Alexandro Colorado <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:47 PM, jan iversen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Thanks Alexandro. > > > > when you write "not unit testing persay", you think of the UNO API > testing > > ? > > > > More than the API alone, there was for other things such as VCL[1], > unfortunately the QA people are not much available anymore I'll still > suggest you contact them[2]. I dont see why they wont help you find some of > the QA process for such. Unfortunatelly many emails including leads are @ > openoffice.org @Sun.com or @oracle.com > > [1] http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Testtool > [2] http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Team_Leads > > > > > > So there are/was basically no direct test of the C++ code, like for e.g. > > transex3 testing it handles the files correctly. > > > > I would have think it would be needed, not only for tools (like l10n), > but > > also for some of the deep internal functions, like e.g. the actual UNO > > implemtation ? > > > > jan. > > > > On 5 November 2012 21:33, Alexandro Colorado <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:22 AM, jan iversen <[email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > I like the page(s), it really getting to be a round introduction for > > new > > > > volunteers. > > > > > > > > I have one question, I thought QA was the right place to find > > information > > > > about AOO requirements for unit testing of C++ code, but I cannot > find > > it > > > > in wiki nor in the QA mail list. Am searching for the wrong words, or > > do > > > we > > > > in general not have unit testing ? > > > > > > > > > > there is/was automation testing but is not unit testing persay. Wiki > > > information: > > > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/test_automation_guide > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My question for asking, it that I want to make that the new l10n > > programs > > > > (which are tools with no gui, and not part of the installation > package) > > > is > > > > automatically tested. > > > > > > > > By the way, I am new on this list but have been on dev/l10n for a > > little > > > > while (you find me on the volunteers page). Long time ago I took an > > > > education as ISO 9000 auditor, and used it on a couple of projects, > > from > > > my > > > > work for big companies, I have been heavily involved in testing > > > > requirements, but only seen from the developer side! > > > > > > > > If I can be of assistance, I would be glad to help. > > > > > > > > Have a nice day. > > > > Jan I. > > > > > > > > On 5 November 2012 16:14, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Zhe Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Nice! > > > > > > It's better to merge your page and the following page into one. > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/qa.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I took a look. I think it is still a good idea to have a "Quality > > > > > Assurance" page and a link to it on the navigator. But we can link > > to > > > > > the orientation page for the "getting started" info. > > > > > > > > > > I'll make some changes. > > > > > > > > > > -Rob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2012/11/3 Rob Weir <[email protected]>: > > > > > >> I took the draft that Yan Ji started and added some additional > > > > material: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/orientation/intro-qa.html > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Please take a look. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Are there any other changes needed? Or is it ready? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> -Rob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > > > From [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Alexandro Colorado > > > PPMC Apache OpenOffice > > > http://es.openoffice.org > > > > > > > > > -- > Alexandro Colorado > PPMC Apache OpenOffice > http://es.openoffice.org >
