Hi Rick 

[enrico@enrico-imac ooRexx.svn.Release]$pkill rxapi
[enrico@enrico-imac ooRexx.svn.Release]$time rexx -e "'pwd | rxqueue' ; say 
queued() "
sleeping 1000 msecs
 99 sleeping 1000 msecs
 98 sleeping 1000 msecs
 97 sleeping 1000 msecs
 96 sleeping 1000 msecs
 95 sleeping 1000 msecs
 94 sleeping 1000 msecs
1

real    0m0.038s
user    0m0.010s
sys     0m0.015s
[enrico@enrico-imac ooRexx.svn.Release]$time rexx -e "'pwd | rxqueue' ; say 
queued() "
1

real    0m0.027s
user    0m0.010s
sys     0m0.013s
[enrico@enrico-imac ooRexx.svn.Release]$

Does not seem too much of a delay

E

PS .
They look more like microseconds to me


> On 2 Dec 2018, at 23:12, Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> So it was taking 7+ seconds for the process to get fully launched? Wow, 
> that's way longer than any of the other platforms. I may keep these smaller 
> than 1000 but increase the number of retries so that it will go at least 10 
> seconds before giving up. 
> 
> Rick
> 
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 5:09 PM Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel 
> <oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
> <mailto:oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>> wrote:
> Both
> e
> 
>> On 2 Dec 2018, at 23:07, Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:object.r...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Which interval did you change? The first wait after the server launch or the 
>> loop one?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel>
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to