----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6847/#review11035 -----------------------------------------------------------
IMO, until WFGEN is functional complete we should not include it in distro tarball. Also, when we do that, I don't think it should be by default in the tomcat server used by Oozie server but in a separate one. Wondering if we should have a separate binary tarball for it. thoughts? - Alejandro Abdelnur On Sept. 1, 2012, 5:34 a.m., Ryota Egashira wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/6847/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 1, 2012, 5:34 a.m.) > > > Review request for oozie. > > > Description > ------- > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-976 > > > This addresses bug OOZIE-976. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-976 > > > Diffs > ----- > > branches/branch-3.3/pom.xml 1379690 > branches/branch-3.3/src/main/assemblies/distro.xml 1379690 > branches/branch-3.3/workflowgenerator/README.txt 1379690 > branches/branch-3.3/workflowgenerator/pom.xml 1379690 > > branches/branch-3.3/workflowgenerator/src/main/assemblies/workflowgenerator.xml > 1379690 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6847/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > done locally > > > Thanks, > > Ryota Egashira > >
