On 8 Jan 2015, at 20:36, Richard Mortier <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 8 January 2015 at 18:52, Anil Madhavapeddy <[email protected]> wrote: >> Greetings! I've been cleaning up the bulk build infrastructure for OPAM and >> will have a blog post about it in a few days, but in the meanwhile I thought >> you might like to see the output: >> >> http://www.recoil.org/~avsm/opam-bulk/ (temporary URL) >> >> I intend to leave this building in a loop and put it online on >> http://ocamlot.ocaml.org so that we have a convenient reference for the >> overall build status. >> > > cool. making the package names links to their (github?) repo would be > nice. might make it easier to investigate issues. Links would be useful but I'm curious about your choice of URL for the final output. Wouldn't it make more sense to keep it under the opam.ocaml.org domain? Something like http://opam.ocaml.org/repo-status. Amir _______________________________________________ opam-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel
