On 8 Jan 2015, at 19:49, Amir Chaudhry <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 8 Jan 2015, at 20:36, Richard Mortier <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 8 January 2015 at 18:52, Anil Madhavapeddy <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Greetings! I've been cleaning up the bulk build infrastructure for OPAM and >>> will have a blog post about it in a few days, but in the meanwhile I >>> thought you might like to see the output: >>> >>> http://www.recoil.org/~avsm/opam-bulk/ (temporary URL) >>> >>> I intend to leave this building in a loop and put it online on >>> http://ocamlot.ocaml.org so that we have a convenient reference for the >>> overall build status. >>> >> >> cool. making the package names links to their (github?) repo would be >> nice. might make it easier to investigate issues. > > Links would be useful but I'm curious about your choice of URL for the final > output. Wouldn't it make more sense to keep it under the opam.ocaml.org > domain? Something like http://opam.ocaml.org/repo-status.
Good suggestions -- I've updated it to add the links where available now. The logs are quite large, so I'm not sure that loading them into the opam.ocaml.org is a good idea -- but I'm sure we can make it fit with some VM resizing if necessary. -anil _______________________________________________ opam-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel
