On Tuesday 05 April 2005 19:31, Andr� Pouliot wrote:
> It sure would be nice if it cost be the lowest possible. And the fact
> that the PCI interface will be in a CPLD have some draw back for the
> cost, the opportunity to code a pci interface and transmission delay
> between the CPLD and FPGA. It do have the advantage for the pci bus
> that the device doesn't dissaspear suddently and if the programation
> fail your still able to upload new code. That said,  the fact the
> product is going to asic the FPGA card not having the CPLD would not
> be a great dissavantage since most of the people buying the prototype
> card would have or be able to build a JTAG cable
> www.*xilinx*.com/support/programr/*jtag*_*cable*.pdf

I have one actually.  I've been waiting for a chance to use it.

> For the debugging feature as I see it there's only some necessary : a
> lot of header for signal test point something like two 40 pins
> headers and the jtag header. For the last part, sorry to dissapoint
> you Daniel ;), but I like my board to have at less 2 led, one to
> signal when programing and one for a visual watchdog.

;)

Regards,

Daniel

_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to