On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Bill Erickson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > As we look toward planning the next release of Evergreen (after 2.2), there > are a couple of simple, but important questions we need to answer. > > 1. Is it time to jump to 3.0 or do we stay with 2.3? > > I'm not aware of any significant architectural changes (e.g. changing PG > versions) on the horizon, which would suggest we stick with 2.3. Perhaps > it's too early to tell? > > For reference: http://evergreen-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=versioning
I vote for 2.3, with a corollary of changing "major feature release" criteria to "minor feature release would be 2 digits otherwise". Infrastructure is pretty much always changing. For example, the next releases would be: 2.3 2.4 ... 2.9 3.0 (to avoid 2.10) > 2. Do we return to the originally proposed March/September release schedule? > > My impression is there's a general consensus to do this. It would lead to a > shortened development cycle for next release, so I would like to give > everyone a chance to voice their concerns / alternate suggestions and put > this to a vote. +1
