Quoting Bill Erickson <[email protected]>:
1. Is it time to jump to 3.0 or do we stay with 2.3?
2. Do we return to the originally proposed March/September release schedule?
I vote "yes" on 2, and "yes, sort of 1."
My inclination is to go with a version numbering scheme identical to
what Ubuntu does with their timed releases. That is, we should use
YY.MM for the "version" numbers. Thus, if we keep to a Marc/September
schedule, then the September release would be 12.09.
I think the above makes as much sense, if not more, as anything else,
since version numbering schemes are all arbitrary.
--
Jason Stephenson
Assistant Director for Technology Services
Merrimack Valley Library Consortium
Chief Bug Wrangler, Evergreen ILS
