+1 from me too, with a couple of follow-up questions/comments:

Of course, a strict interpretation of this policy presumes that
showstopper issues with the web staff client are addressed by 3.0.0,
or at least early in the 3.0.x maintenance release cycle.
This was briefly discussed during yesterday's meeting, but to properly identify these showstopper issues, should we be setting showstopper web client bugs to a priority of 'high' in Launchpad? Or is there another way we should be identifying them?

A further implication is
that if you want to get a particular XUL-only bugfix into Evergreen,
you have until the 3.0.0 release candidate is cut on 27 September to
get it in.
I recently used a xulclient tag for bugs with a pullrequest tag where the fix only applied to the xul client. I thought it would be useful for identifying these bugs during the Feedback Fest where quicker action might be needed so that they are merged before the 3.0 release. There were only two bugs at the time, and one has since been merged. If future XUL-only bug fixes are submitted, it might be useful to use this tag to bring some attention to the bug before the September 27 cutoff.

Thanks Galen!


On 08/03/2017 11:32 AM, Jason Etheridge wrote:
+1 from me as well :)


--
Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 343-0128
kluss...@masslnc.org
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier

Reply via email to