On 02/22/2011 10:05 AM, Marjolein Kremer wrote:
Hi Lebbeous and David,
Thanks for your help with predicting a pattern and issuance for a weekly. What
worked for Lebbeous worked for us.
We have one remark though concerning our 2nd try. You say the subfields $i and
$j are reversed from what was defined in the pattern code. Since we only used
the wizards, could this also be a bug?
Hi Marjolein,
No problem.
Given the pattern code
["2","0","8","1","a","vol","b","nr","u","52","v","r","i","(year)","j","(month)","k","(week)","w","w"]
I created an issuance and tried to get the holding code wizard to
generate the holding code with $i and $j reversed (as below), but I did
not succeed.
["4","1","8","1","a","10","b","52","i",52,"j",2010]
I wonder if the above holding code actually went along with your fourth
example pattern code rather than your first one? At any rate, I will
keep an eye on the holding code wizard for any bugs of this nature.
I also hope to enhance the pattern code wizard eventually so that
creating functioning patterns for common cases such as weekly
periodicals is more intuitive. In fact, this wizard already has a new
feature or two in trunk that didn't make it into 2.0.
Thanks for bearing with us, and thanks to David, too, for his help!
Regards,
Marjolein
--
Lebbeous
