The only reason I wanted them included in our parameters is so that when we complete this project, we can submit it to become part of the permanent Evergreen code, if the power that be so choose. These control numbers might be very important for libraries in the UK, Australia, and etc.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Hardy, Elaine <eha...@georgialibraries.org> wrote: > We do strip them on import. I did not realize that also meant it would > strip them when added to an existing MARC record. Too me that is 2 > different procedures > > > > We don’t use them – I don’t see the need for them either. I was testing > for Don. > > > > *Elaine* > > > > J. Elaine Hardy > PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager > Georgia Public Library Service > 1800 Century Place, Ste 150 > Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304 > > > > 404.235.7128 > 404.235.7201, fax > eha...@georgialibraries.org > www.georgialibraries.org > www.georgialibraries.org/pines > > > > *From:* Open-ils-general [mailto: > open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf Of *Dea > Nowell > *Sent:* Thursday, October 01, 2015 1:57 PM > > *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group > *Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029 > > > > Mary, we also strip the 029s as we don't see any reason to keep them. I'm > just noting that stripping them on import may be why Elaine (& possibly > Don) are unable to add them to records. > - Dea Nowell > > On 10/1/2015 10:37 AM, Mary Llewellyn wrote: > > We’re stripping the 029s. Am I missing a reason why we should be keeping > them? > > > > Mary > > > > Mary Llewellyn > > Database Manager > > Bibliomation, Inc. > > 24 Wooster Ave. > > Waterbury, CT 06708 > > mllew...@biblio.org > > > > > > > > *From:* Open-ils-general [ > mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org > <open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org>] *On Behalf Of *Dea > Nowell > *Sent:* Thursday, October 01, 2015 12:58 PM > *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group > *Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029 > > > > Elaine, is your system stripping the 029 on import of records into the > system? If so this is why it will not save the 029 in a record. We just > discovered this with our system (Sage Library System) recently with a > different field. Once we removed the field from those that were being > stripped on import we were able to have the field saved in the bib. Just a > thought to explore & it may address Don's query as well, I'm not sure. > - Dea Nowell > > _______________________________ > > [image: UCSLD logo & tagline] > > ___________________________________ > > > > Dea Nowell, Technical Services Manager > > Umatilla County Special Library District > > 17 SW Frazer, Suite 360 > > P O Box 1689 > > Pendleton OR 97801 > > (541) 966-0917 --> (406) 952-4049 > > email: d...@ucsld.org || web: www.ucsld.org > > On 10/1/2015 9:41 AM, Hardy, Elaine wrote: > > I was able to add an 016 to a bib record in the PINES database. I was not > able to add an 029 > > > > An 029 is a field used by OCLC to “system control numbers for records from > non-OCLC automated systems (e.g., Library and Archives Canada, the British > Library, WorldCat Cataloging Partners vendors, etc.). OCLC uses these > numbers to process and track records from other systems.” > http://www.oclc.org/bib > formats/en/0xx/029.html <http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/029.html>. > Not sure why it doesn’t retain on save. An 019, which is another field > specific to OCLC, does (see http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/019.html). > 029 seems to be system supplied; but, the 019 is system supplied… > > > > *Elaine* > > > > J. Elaine Hardy PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager Georgia Public > Library Service 1800 Century Place, Ste 150 Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304 > > > > 404.235.7128 404.235.7201, fax eha...@georgialibraries.org > www.georgialibraries.org www.georgialibraries.org/pines > > > > *From:* Open-ils-general [ > mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org > <open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org>] *On Behalf Of *Donald > Butterworth *Sent:* Thursday, October 01, 2015 11:48 AM *To:* Evergreen > Discussion Group *Subject:* [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029 > > > > Hi Everyone, > > As part of a project to add more fields to the general keyword index, we > discovered that we can't add the 016 and the 029 control number fields to a > MARC record. > > It looks like it saves, but it isn't there when you do a new search. It > also never shows on the MARC View screen. > > What do we need to do to add these fields? > > Thanks! > > Don > > -- > > Don Butterworth Faculty Associate / Librarian III B.L. Fisher Library > Asbury Theological Seminary don.butterwo...@asburyseminary.edu (859) > 858-2227 > > -- Don Butterworth Faculty Associate / Librarian III B.L. Fisher Library Asbury Theological Seminary don.butterwo...@asburyseminary.edu (859) 858-2227
