I thought it was a local indexing project and was wondering why you would want either field indexed!
I still am not sure they would be practical fields to index since they are control numbers analogous to OCLC TCNs. As such, they might to be in an 001 in the originating library catalog, which is already indexed. There are days, however, when I would prefer to search for a TCN in advanced or basic (we use OCLC TCNs as our TCNs), so would like the 035 indexed. Elaine J. Elaine Hardy PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager Georgia Public Library Service 1800 Century Place, Ste 150 Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304 404.235.7128 404.235.7201, fax eha...@georgialibraries.org www.georgialibraries.org www.georgialibraries.org/pines From: Open-ils-general [mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Donald Butterworth Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 2:10 PM To: Evergreen Discussion Group Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029 The only reason I wanted them included in our parameters is so that when we complete this project, we can submit it to become part of the permanent Evergreen code, if the power that be so choose. These control numbers might be very important for libraries in the UK, Australia, and etc. On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Hardy, Elaine <eha...@georgialibraries.org> wrote: We do strip them on import. I did not realize that also meant it would strip them when added to an existing MARC record. Too me that is 2 different procedures We don’t use them – I don’t see the need for them either. I was testing for Don. Elaine J. Elaine Hardy PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager Georgia Public Library Service 1800 Century Place, Ste 150 Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304 404.235.7128 404.235.7201, fax eha...@georgialibraries.org www.georgialibraries.org www.georgialibraries.org/pines From: Open-ils-general [mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Dea Nowell Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 1:57 PM To: Evergreen Discussion Group Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029 Mary, we also strip the 029s as we don't see any reason to keep them. I'm just noting that stripping them on import may be why Elaine (& possibly Don) are unable to add them to records. - Dea Nowell On 10/1/2015 10:37 AM, Mary Llewellyn wrote: We’re stripping the 029s. Am I missing a reason why we should be keeping them? Mary Mary Llewellyn Database Manager Bibliomation, Inc. 24 Wooster Ave. Waterbury, CT 06708 mllew...@biblio.org From: Open-ils-general [mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Dea Nowell Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 12:58 PM To: Evergreen Discussion Group Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029 Elaine, is your system stripping the 029 on import of records into the system? If so this is why it will not save the 029 in a record. We just discovered this with our system (Sage Library System) recently with a different field. Once we removed the field from those that were being stripped on import we were able to have the field saved in the bib. Just a thought to explore & it may address Don's query as well, I'm not sure. - Dea Nowell _______________________________ UCSLD logo & tagline ___________________________________ Dea Nowell, Technical Services Manager Umatilla County Special Library District 17 SW Frazer, Suite 360 P O Box 1689 Pendleton OR 97801 (541) 966-0917 <tel:%28541%29%20966-0917> --> (406) 952-4049 <tel:%28406%29%20952-4049> email: d...@ucsld.org || web: www.ucsld.org On 10/1/2015 9:41 AM, Hardy, Elaine wrote: I was able to add an 016 to a bib record in the PINES database. I was not able to add an 029 An 029 is a field used by OCLC to “system control numbers for records from non-OCLC automated systems (e.g., Library and Archives Canada, the British Library, WorldCat Cataloging Partners vendors, etc.). OCLC uses these numbers to process and track records from other systems.” http://www.oclc.org/bib formats/en/0xx/029.html <http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/029.html> . Not sure why it doesn’t retain on save. An 019, which is another field specific to OCLC, does (see http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/019.html). 029 seems to be system supplied; but, the 019 is system supplied… Elaine J. Elaine Hardy PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager Georgia Public Library Service 1800 Century Place, Ste 150 Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304 404.235.7128 404.235.7201, fax eha...@georgialibraries.org www.georgialibraries.org www.georgialibraries.org/pines From: Open-ils-general [mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Donald Butterworth Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 11:48 AM To: Evergreen Discussion Group Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029 Hi Everyone, As part of a project to add more fields to the general keyword index, we discovered that we can't add the 016 and the 029 control number fields to a MARC record. It looks like it saves, but it isn't there when you do a new search. It also never shows on the MARC View screen. What do we need to do to add these fields? Thanks! Don -- Don Butterworth Faculty Associate / Librarian III B.L. Fisher Library Asbury Theological Seminary don.butterwo...@asburyseminary.edu (859) 858-2227 <tel:%28859%29%20858-2227> -- Don Butterworth Faculty Associate / Librarian III B.L. Fisher Library Asbury Theological Seminary don.butterwo...@asburyseminary.edu (859) 858-2227