I would vote no, also. I agree that the cataloging listserv is currently very low volume, and I would not mind at all seeing the acquisitions discussion on the cataloging list if a relatively quiet space is needed to hash things out. I say this as a subscriber to the cataloging listserv with no direct interest in acq, as we're not currently using it at my library. I think including all tech services topics on the cataloging list is totally appropriate.
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 5:59 PM, Christine Burns < christine.bu...@bc.libraries.coop> wrote: > Hello > > The Acquisitions Interest Group is requesting an Acquisitions specific > listserv. Currently Acquisitions falls under the Cataloguers list with the > rest of technicial services. During the Acquisitions Interest Group > meeting at the Evergreen Conference this month the group discussed the need > for an Acquisitions specific listserv to facilitate AIG activity. We are > anticipating an increased amount of Acquisitions specific discussions > during the Angularization of the Acquisitions module in the web client. > > This topic is open for discussion please voice your opinion by *Friday > May 5th*. > > A copy of the meeting minutes can be found on the Acquisitions Interest > Group wiki page here - https://wiki.evergreen-ils. > org/doku.php?id=acq:interest-group > > Thank you > Christine > > -- > Christine Burns > Co-op Support > BC Libraries Cooperative > Ph: 1-888-848-9250 > <(888)%20848-9250>https://bc.libraries.coophttps://status.libraries.coop/ > > -- Sarah Childs Technical Services Department Head Hussey-Mayfield Memorial Public Library 250 North Fifth Street Zionsville, IN 46077 317-873-3149 x13330 sar...@zionsvillelibrary.org
