On Mar 5, 4:36 am, Mike Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Christie wrote: > >> Were there any default parameters changed from open-iscsi-2.0-707 and > >> open-iscsi-2.0-865 ? > > > None, that should affect you like how you are seeing. Could you try this > > tarball > >http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mnc/open-iscsi/releases/ope... > > > And try it with different IO schedulers by doing > > cat > /sys/block/sdb/queue/scheduler > > echo $ONE_OF_THE_VALUES_FROM_THE_CAT > /sys/block/sdb/queue/scheduler > > > Please be carefull with the tarball. It is not stable, and just for a > > quick performance test. > > Oh yeah, could you also > tryhttp://www.open-iscsi.org/bits/open-iscsi-2.0-868-rc1.tar.gz > this one fixes a perf problem we saw with some other targets.
Right, I'm talking with SuSE at the moment, they want me to try changing /sys/block/sdX/device/retries (from 5 to 10) They also want a tcpdump, but I've told them that will be in the gigabytes of size. I gave them the tcpdump summary from above... Once I've done experimenting with retries and send the details back to SuSE I'll try your suggestions (-: *phew* so busy... so much to do! At the moment I'm using a development server for testing (it fails just like the production servers do with the distro supplied open- iscsi drivers), so I'm not worried if your tarball nukes the server. Thanks again --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
