Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Ulrich Windl > <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: >> Considering that most remote iSCSI targets have "intelligece" of their own, >> the >> use of a no-op i/O scheduler seems justified. I think multiple I/O >> schedulers on >> both ends don't necessarily make things faster, unless there is a bunch of >> requests that can be compacted into one. Then throughput rises while >> response may >> decline. > > Is request merging implemented in the SCSI layer or in the I/O scheduler ? >
I/O scheduler. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
