> -----Original Message-----
> From: open-iscsi@googlegroups.com [mailto:open-is...@googlegroups.com]
> On Behalf Of Ulrich Windl
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 1:27 PM
> To: open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
> Subject: RE: minimum password length check
> 
> On 17 Dec 2009 at 0:55, shyam_i...@dell.com wrote:
> 
> > Essentially what you are saying is that we haven't implemented the
> > secret's bit randomness calculation to check if has atleast 96bits
of
> > entropy.
> >
> 
> No, I just wanted to point out that the quality of a secret key cannot
> simply be
> measured with "strlen(password)", and that 96 bits of randomness may
> require a
> longer string as one might initially have guessed.
> 

Right I get you right then.. 

Don't want to rework on getting the entropy of the secret. Do you mind
open-sourcing it so we could do the checks as I detailed in the previous
mail?

Thanks,
Shyam

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"open-iscsi" group.
To post to this group, send email to open-is...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi?hl=en.


Reply via email to