>>> Ben Turner <btur...@redhat.com> schrieb am 07.10.2010 um 15:54 in Nachricht <1465692532.1411741286459697916.javamail.r...@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redha .com>: > What are you looking for more throughput or redundancy? You could bond NICs > or use 10GB nics for throughput and/or use DM Multipath for redundancy. Each
The current config is 2*2*2*2 redundant, but these 16 paths all lead to one storage system (where the virtual disk is RAID5). Someone thought it's a SPoF (Single Point of Failure) and wants to avoid that. So I want extra redundancy. We already use two NICs through multipath, as well as two physically separate portals with two NICs each. > NIC for single NICs or bond for bonded interfaces should have its own iface > configured, check the man page for iscsiadm for details ther. > > -b > > ----- "Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > a question: From what I've read, md won't work with open-iscsi (in > > SLES10). What options do exist to have a RAID1 setup using two > > different storage systems? I only have experience with md and local > > disks. > > > > Regards, > > Ulrich > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "open-iscsi" group. > > To post to this group, send email to open-is...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post to this group, send email to open-is...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi?hl=en.
