One more thing -- there are tools to help with this:
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html The source headers in Beehive were updated in a matter of minutes, and there were a *lot* of them. :) Just make sure that the files that are CDDL licensed or don't otherwise have headers (shouldn't be any of these...) don't inherit one. The tools are here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/ If anyone doesn't have access to this, just let me know. Eddie On 4/14/07, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Craig-- You're quite right; my apologies for not having caught this before now. Given that this policy went into effect in November 2006, IMHO the 0.9.7 release that we're currently reviewing and voting on needs to be updated to include the appropriate headers. Thoughts? Eddie On 4/14/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The license headers we are using are in conflict with current > practice, as documented here: > > http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html > > There was a big discussion about this topic, but the above is > normative as of today. See the discussion in this message: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/ > 200612.mbox/% > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Bottom line, there should not be a copyright notice in the source > headers, only a license notice. > > Craig Russell > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo > 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > >
