RE: [OpenAFS-devel] pam_afs.so in 64 bit version for sparcv9?

[Derrick J Brashear]

On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, Charles Clancy wrote:

> > > > Second, I tried adding '-xarch=v9' to the XCFLAGS line of
> > > > src/config/Makefile.sun4x_58, to compile EVERYTHING as 64-bit.  That
> > > > didn't work either:
> > >
> > > Right, you only want to do that for libraries, not for binaries.
> >
> > Further, it may be possible to use just libafsauth and libafsrpc to link
> > the pam module, and if so compiling v9 versions of just these libraries
> > should be easy to add to the build procedure.
> 
> Success.  Anyone interested, check out:
> /afs/cs.rose-hulman.edu/openafs/source/openafs-1.1.1/sun4x_58/dest/lib/pam_afs.*

Since it works, now thought is required. Should v9 libraries go in
(dest)/lib/sparcv9? It seems logical given how Sun handles them.

-D


_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel