--On Sunday, July 22, 2001 21:57:16 -0500 Charles Clancy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, Derrick J Brashear wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, Derrick J Brashear wrote:
>>
>> > On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, Charles Clancy wrote:
>> > > Second, I tried adding '-xarch=v9' to the XCFLAGS line of
>> > > src/config/Makefile.sun4x_58, to compile EVERYTHING as 64-bit. That
>> > > didn't work either:
>> >
>> > Right, you only want to do that for libraries, not for binaries.
>>
>> Further, it may be possible to use just libafsauth and libafsrpc to link
>> the pam module, and if so compiling v9 versions of just these libraries
>> should be easy to add to the build procedure.
>
> Success. Anyone interested, check out:
> /afs/cs.rose-hulman.edu/openafs/source/openafs-1.1.1/sun4x_58/dest/lib/pa
> m_afs.*
Thanks for experimenting with this. I copied your binary in order to make
sure that it loads. It does, but it doesn't work properly. Using truss I
get the following error message:
7146: write(2, 0xFFFFFFFF7D901348, 155) = 155
7146: l d . s o . 1 : / u s r / l i b / s e n d m a i l : f a t a
7146: l : r e l o c a t i o n e r r o r : f i l e / u s r / l
7146: i b / s e c u r i t y / s p a r c v 9 / p a m _ a f s . s o . 1
7146: : s y m b o l k a _ V e r i f y U s e r P a s s w o r d :
7146: r e f e r e n c e d s y m b o l n o t f o u n d
I guess the reason for this is simply that we are still using OpenAFS 1.0.4
while your PAM module was compiled with 1.1.1.
So I'd like to do the compilation myself. How exactly did you do it?
Thanks and greetings, Sebastian Hagedorn
--
Sebastian Hagedorn M.A. - RZKR, Zimmer 18
Zentrum f�r angewandte Informatik - Unversit�tsweiter Service RRZK
Universit�t zu K�ln / Cologne University - Tel. +49-221-478-5587
PGP signature
