On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: > --On Tuesday, July 24, 2001 01:21:43 -0400 Derrick J Brashear > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does truss show anything useful happening? If not, try sotruss, and see if > > that tells you anything. > > This seems to be the relevant part from truss: pretty useless. what does sotruss tell you? > What's interesting is that the SASL library apparently does not use libpam, > but instead it parses pam.conf itself and it accesses the modules > directly... Not sure if that's relevant, though. The Cyrus SASL library? That doesn't sound right. -D _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] pam_afs.so in 64 bit version for sp... Sebastian Hagedorn
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] pam_afs.so in 64 bit version for sp... Charles Clancy
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] pam_afs.so in 64 bit version f... Sebastian Hagedorn
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] pam_afs.so in 64 bit version for sp... Charles Clancy
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] pam_afs.so in 64 bit version for sp... Sebastian Hagedorn
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] pam_afs.so in 64 bit version f... Charles Clancy
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] pam_afs.so in 64 bit version f... Derrick J Brashear
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] pam_afs.so in 64 bit version for sp... Charles Clancy
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] pam_afs.so in 64 bit version for sp... Derrick J Brashear
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] pam_afs.so in 64 bit version for sp... Sebastian Hagedorn
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] pam_afs.so in 64 bit version for sp... Derrick J Brashear
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] pam_afs.so in 64 bit version for sp... Charles Clancy
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] pam_afs.so in 64 bit version f... Sebastian Hagedorn
