Derek Atkins wrote: >Frank Bagehorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I still would consider the missing symbols as a bug in the new kernel. >> What would be the sense in leaving out kallsyms_symbol_to_address and >> keeping kallsyms_address_to_symbol ? >> It's very easy to add the export statements for the two missing functions >> to .../linux/kernel/ksyms.c and re-compile the kernel, then everything >> works again. >> Without the need to fix RedHat's problems within the OpenAFS source >> code... > >Yes, but that requires rebuilding the kernel which can be challenging >on a large-scale deployment.
I think it's the other way around; I do large-scale deployment, and compiling and installing a new kernel is a blip on the big picture. I think it's the little guy who is less likely to be able to handle the extra task(s). And, yes, removing symbols like that in a maintenance kernel is pathetic; are you listening, Red Hat? Dave _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
