Chaskiel M Grundman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --On Tuesday, October 22, 2002 11:17:03 +0200 Frank Bagehorn
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What would be the sense in leaving out kallsyms_symbol_to_address and
> > keeping kallsyms_address_to_symbol ?
> My personal suspicion is that it was intended to specifically break my
> previous patch. hence the diatribe in the P.S. of my announcement.
Why would Red Hat specifically care about OpenAFS? In particular, why
would they care about making it fail to work?
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
