> i believe the fundamental problem with rx is this idea of packets inside > a jumbogram.
You're probably right. The first jumbogram implementation of RX didn't do that -- it just used big UDP datagrams with a single RX header. But it had some problems with routers which had small queues, so somebody put in that "packet headers inside jumbograms" code which, I suspect, obviates most of the performance gains from the original work. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
