On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, chas williams wrote: > nfs (over udp) doesnt really do anything fancy and see fairly good > performance. better than afs typically (for uncached files). rx > (after its rewrite) has assorted tcp features. i dont believe any > of these features are fundamentally broken. they are just hampered > by the jumbogram mechanism. it seems like there would be more gain from > making the smallish number of changes to rx jumbograms instead of adding > (and debugging) a tcp implementation.
It won't solve any NAT issues that TCP with kept-open connections would. Still, speaking for myself I at least would like to see the jumbogram fixes. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
