On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 04:17:51PM +0200, Tomas Olsson wrote: > My main problem with the last lkml patch I saw is that session keyrings are > cleared for "SUID programs and setuid()/setreuid()/setresuid()". I can see > that this functionality is handy for some daemons, so those semantics won't > change. If we want something else, we'd better have some good and > obviously valid arguments.
In the current proposal which I believe Kyle Moffett is coding up right now, setuid() and co. don't do anything with the keyrings. john _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
