In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Jim Rees writes: >That's not complaining, that's useful testing info. I will venture a guess >that a 20GB cache works better with the new autotuning than it did with the >old defaults.
yes! the old code asked for 3 times as much kernel memory and vmalloc failed at some point. >I'm inclined to commit the new code and let Niklas or others work on making >it better for large caches later. Comments? i was thinking the number of files shouldnt be a linear relationship to the cachesize simply because there is quite a bit less kernel memory than disk. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
