Steve Simmons <[email protected]> writes:

> On Apr 20, 2010, at 3:44 PM, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
>
>>> would it be better to have <ip version="4" address="192.168.1.1" /> ?
>>> Would that be better to anticipate ipv6?
>> 
>> No, I don't think so.  IMHO it is better to think of IPv6 as a different 
>> protocol, rather than as a new version of an existing protocol.  
>
> Surely there must be some prior art on how to express ipv4 vs. ipv6 in
> XML?___

Ascii format?

-derek
-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       [email protected]                        PGP key available
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

Reply via email to