Steve Simmons <[email protected]> writes: > On Apr 26, 2010, at 8:47 PM, Derek Atkins wrote: > >> Steve Simmons <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> On Apr 20, 2010, at 3:44 PM, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote: >>> >>>>> would it be better to have <ip version="4" address="192.168.1.1" /> ? >>>>> Would that be better to anticipate ipv6? >>>> >>>> No, I don't think so. IMHO it is better to think of IPv6 as a different >>>> protocol, rather than as a new version of an existing protocol. >>> >>> Surely there must be some prior art on how to express ipv4 vs. ipv6 in >>> XML?___ >> >> Ascii format? > > I'm thinking tags and dtd, not the value.
Maybe you could base it off the IPFIX schema? http://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/schema/ipfix.xsd -derek -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH [email protected] PGP key available _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
