(No personal copies necessary, thank you) > The major version is 1.4. It's just a way at looking numbers. Does > OpenAFS need to call its versions 1.1.4-12, 1.1.4-16 and 1.1.6-0 > to please the Linux distros?
I wouldn't even want to try going there :) I was just trying to explain what I thought was the reason. I'm not taking a stance on whether it's sensible or whether OpenAFS should try to accommodate any particular third party with its version numbering scheme as you suggest :-) -- Atro Tossavainen (Mr.) / Working for Infinite Mho Oy in 2011 Techno-Amish & UNIX Dinosaur / +358-40-529-4071, -44-5000-600 / and beyond? who knows < URL : http : / / www . infinitemho . fi / > _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
