On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:37 AM, Atro Tossavainen <[email protected]> wrote: > (No personal copies necessary, thank you) > >> The major version is 1.4. It's just a way at looking numbers. Does >> OpenAFS need to call its versions 1.1.4-12, 1.1.4-16 and 1.1.6-0 >> to please the Linux distros? > > I wouldn't even want to try going there :) > > I was just trying to explain what I thought was the reason. I'm not > taking a stance on whether it's sensible or whether OpenAFS should try > to accommodate any particular third party with its version numbering > scheme as you suggest :-)
gzcat openafs-1.4.14-src.tar.gz|sed s/1.4.14/1.4.12.1/g |gzip -9 > openafs-1.4.12.1a-src.tar.gz no one likes my ideas. -- Derrick _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
